<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Appleology &#187; Appleologist</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.appleology.com/author/appleologist/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.appleology.com</link>
	<description>Making Apple and Apple Users Think Different</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:04:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Time to fork iTunes</title>
		<link>http://www.appleology.com/2009/08/05/time-to-fork-itunes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appleology.com/2009/08/05/time-to-fork-itunes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Appleologist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod+iTunes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appleology.com/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[January 8, 2007, the day Steve Jobs introduced the iPhone to the world, was the day Apple lost its innocence. Since then, Apple has regrown to become one of the biggest, if not the biggest, names in the consumer tech industry. But are they still thinking different?
The worst thing that can happen to Apple now [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style=' float: right; padding: 4px; margin: 0 0 2px 7px;'  class="alignright size-medium wp-image-418" title="appstore" src="http://www.appleology.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/appstore_browsebuy20080909-300x202.jpg" alt="appstore" width="300" height="202" />January 8, 2007, the day Steve Jobs introduced the iPhone to the world, was the day Apple lost its innocence. Since then, Apple has regrown to become one of the biggest, if not the biggest, names in the consumer tech industry. But are they still thinking different?</p>
<p>The worst thing that can happen to Apple now is for them to lose their core fan-base. From his excellent article <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2009/07/microsofts_long_slow_decline">Microsoft’s Long, Slow Decline</a>, John Gruber makes an excellent point on a certain phenomenon of industries with an active fan-base:</p>
<blockquote><p>Microsoft has lost all but a sliver of this entire market. People who love computers overwhelmingly prefer to use a Mac today. Microsoft’s core problem is that they have lost the hearts of computer enthusiasts. Regular people don’t think about their choice of computer platform in detail and with passion like nerds do because, duh, they are not nerds. But nerds are leading indicators.</p>
<p>This is true in many markets with broad appeal, not just computers. Microsoft is looking ever more so like the digital equivalent of General Motors. Car enthusiasts lost interest in GM’s cars long before regular people did; the same is happening with Windows.</p></blockquote>
<p>But I fear that just as Apple is about to reclaim its dominance in the computer market, they are going to lose exactly what Microsoft lost several years ago. Apple&#8217;s most critical fan-base is its developers that have risked a lot to build the iTunes app store to what it has become, and secure the iPhone as a long-term leader in the smartphone market. The reason why I don&#8217;t see Android, Palm, and Windows Mobile taking serious share from Apple anytime soon is the iPod functionality and the abundance of applications in the app store. But if Apple keeps screwing around with its core base, this dominance won&#8217;t last forever.</p>
<p>The solution? Overhaul the app store and its approval process by separating the iTunes music store from the iTunes app store.</p>
<p>Why did Apple start out with the app store as a part of the iTunes store? It was the easiest way to get it the iTunes app store online &#8211; they just had to build on the iTunes music store infrastructure. iTMS also provided guaranteed great amount of traffic to kickstart the app store and ensure its success. But now we are seeing the downsides of the app store being a part of the iTunes store. The app store has had an incredible start, but it&#8217;s long due for an overhaul.</p>
<p>In iPhone OS, Apple does not bundle the app store with the music store. They are separate icons: &#8220;App Store&#8221; and &#8220;iTunes&#8221;. The way it should be. The desktop version of iTunes is so bloated, it&#8217;s ridiculous. How come an application that is supposed to be a music player is now the hub of all our digital content? Why is iTunes in charge of my photos, my calendars, my contacts, and my applications?</p>
<p>I remember there were rumors a few years ago that Apple was going to rename iTunes to something like &#8220;iMedia&#8221;. I don&#8217;t see this happening. Instead, I envision iTunes becomes the lean music and podcast player that it used to be, and a new application that will be in charge of everything else. iTunes will no longer sync with iPods and iPhones. The new application (I have no idea what it would be called), would be in charge of all syncing of data, and will be the host of the new App Store.</p>
<p>When Apple separates the app store from the iTunes music store, they need to reimplement the approval process. <a href="http://www.polarbearfarm.com/blog/?p=124">Clean up iTunes Connect</a>. Provide a more scalable approval process that doesn&#8217;t piss developers off because they have a faulty app on the market an they can&#8217;t get an update out for a week or two, in the meantime suffering from negative reviews that will destroy the application and the developer&#8217;s reputation for a long time.</p>
<p>And while Apple&#8217;s at it, they can do some other things to help ensure continued success by reorganizing the store to ensure more fair visibility for applications. Probably the biggest issue with the app store now is that the majority of apps are $.99. This means less revenue for developers and Apple. This has all happened because of the way Apple sorts the applications. The solution? Introduce new sections, the a &#8220;Top Rated&#8221; section. Also, make the &#8220;Top Paid&#8221; application list not sort by the number of applications sold, but the revenue generated by the number of applications sold. Then applications that are a little bit more that don&#8217;t sell quite as many will get a higher position in the Top Apps list. When this happens, developers will no longer be pressured to sell their apps for the dirt-cheap price of $.99. For this reason alone, I believe that Apple is already working on an iTunes store overhaul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appleology.com/2009/08/05/time-to-fork-itunes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>October 14 &#8220;Notebooks&#8221; Event confirmed</title>
		<link>http://www.appleology.com/2008/10/09/october-14-notebooks-event-confirmed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appleology.com/2008/10/09/october-14-notebooks-event-confirmed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Appleologist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appleology.com/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple this morning sent out invitations to a press event in San Francisco next Tuesday at 10am PST (1pm EST). The invitation simply is a picture of a light shining on an aluminum notebook along with the text &#8221;The spotlight turns to notebooks.&#8221;

Speculators believe the biggest point to be made at this event is that Apple will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple this morning sent out invitations to a press event in San Francisco next Tuesday at 10am PST (1pm EST). The invitation simply is a picture of a light shining on an aluminum notebook along with the text &#8221;The spotlight turns to notebooks.&#8221;</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-405 light" title="oct14macbookevent" src="http://www.appleology.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/top2.jpg" alt="" width="580" height="433" /></p>
<p>Speculators believe the biggest point to be made at this event is that Apple will significantly lower its prices on all MacBook models. Apple is expected to revamp its entire notebook line at this notebook-only event, as all MacBooks models are due for an upgrade. The MacBook and MacBook Pro lines were last updated last February with Penryn processors and a multi-touch trackpad to the MacBook Pro. The MacBook Air was first introduced last January at Macworld Expo 2008 at a very high price-point. Apple is known for introducing first-generation products at a very high price point, then making significant price cuts on the next generation.</p>
<p>Apple has lately been straying from using plastic in its products and moving to more environmentally-friendly and high-grade materials, such as aluminum and glass. The MacBook is the last major Apple product line that has yet to transition away from plastic and this event will likely be the event where this transition will be made. If the MacBook models are to transition to an aluminum enclosure, the MacBooks will look simply appear as a smaller MacBook Pro. For this reason, Apple could consolidate the MacBook Pro and MacBook lines into one singular &#8220;MacBook&#8221; line with different models with varying screen sizes and internal configurations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appleology.com/2008/10/09/october-14-notebooks-event-confirmed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone 2.1 becomes available and delivers</title>
		<link>http://www.appleology.com/2008/09/12/iphone-21-becomes-available-and-delivers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appleology.com/2008/09/12/iphone-21-becomes-available-and-delivers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Appleologist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod+iTunes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appleology.com/?p=379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Jobs mentioned during his September 9 &#8220;Let&#8217;s Rock&#8221; keynote that iPhone 2.1 software would become available for download on Friday and would bring along with it many bug fixes and improvements. He seemed very confident that this update would satisfy troubled iPhone owners. Early reports are claiming the update really delivers &#8211; fixing many of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-382 alignright" style="float: right;;  float: right; padding: 4px; margin: 0 0 2px 7px;" title="iphone-2dot11" src="http://www.appleology.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/iphone-2dot11-208x300.png" alt="" width="208" height="300" />Steve Jobs mentioned during his September 9 &#8220;Let&#8217;s Rock&#8221; keynote that iPhone 2.1 software would become available for download on Friday and would bring along with it many bug fixes and improvements. He seemed very confident that this update would satisfy troubled iPhone owners. Early reports are claiming the update really delivers &#8211; fixing many of the known bugs and issues with iPhone software versions 2.0-2.0.2. The iPhone 2.1 really is a &#8220;big update&#8221; just as Steve Jobs promised and it seems much more like a &#8220;gold master&#8221; than 2.0 ever did.</p>
<p>I have had the chance of updating my iPhone to 2.1, and here are a few things I&#8217;ve noticed:</p>
<ul>
<li>My current iPhone is a replacement. I noticed once I got the replacement that the screen seemed washed out compared to my old iPhone 3G and my original iPhone. A thread on Apple&#8217;s Support Discussions forum had multiple people experiencing this exact same issue with their iPhones. However, upon updating to iPhone 2.1, I noticed the colors are much more vibrant and rich.</li>
<li>The number of bars on my iPhone have increased dramatically. On Apple&#8217;s iPhone 2.1 Software Update page, they include &#8220;Improved accuracy of the 3G signal strength display&#8221; in a list of improvements. I find this somewhat controversial, as it leads one to believe Apple significantly boosted the reception, when in actuality just boosted the number of bars for all db levels.</li>
<li>iPhone backups that used to take literally two hours now only take two minutes.</li>
<li>I installed two apps and both installed within minutes. The delay that used to exist at the end of installing is now gone.</li>
<li>Overall, the interface seems more nimble and responsive. I have yet to see any significant interface delays that once existed with 2.0.</li>
<li>The new &#8220;3G&#8221; and &#8220;EDGE&#8221; icons are much nicer and easier to distinguish.</li>
<li>Apple has updated the iPod application to feature the new Genius feature. For all the songs I have tested, Genius has worked really well. The songs it recommends are unique and compatible. Podcasts and songs now display more information.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> I&#8217;ve done some more real-life testing and now want to add a few more notes:</p>
<ul>
<li>Around town, I seem to have five bars nearly everywhere I go. I find it interesting Apple did not &#8220;improve accuracy of the 3G signal strength display&#8221; in iPhone 2.0, instead waiting for this release. I have a feeling this might cause some controversy.</li>
<li>Interface animations are much smoother now, especially with rotating the screen and rearranging icons on the springboard.</li>
<li>My iPhone 3G speaker seems even louder.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appleology.com/2008/09/12/iphone-21-becomes-available-and-delivers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Store Files on your iPhone or iTouch without Jailbreak with Filemark Maker</title>
		<link>http://www.appleology.com/2008/01/27/store-files-on-your-iphone-or-itouch-without-jailbreak-with-filemark-maker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appleology.com/2008/01/27/store-files-on-your-iphone-or-itouch-without-jailbreak-with-filemark-maker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Appleologist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appleology.com/2008/01/27/store-files-on-your-iphone-or-itouch-without-jailbreak-with-filemark-maker/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Magnetism Studios (aka Monkey Business Labs), makers of some awesome Dashboard widgets and some insanely great tees, has released a new application called Filemark Maker for Mac OS X that allows an iPhone or iPod Touch user to convert any Safari-compatible media file into a bookmarklet, making it possible to store files on your iPhone/iPod [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://appleology.com/images/filemark_maker.png" style="float: right;" alt="Filemark Maker" /><a href="http://www.magnetismstudios.com/">Magnetism Studios</a> (aka Monkey Business Labs), makers of some awesome <a href="http://www.magnetismstudios.com/MonkeyBusinessLabs">Dashboard widgets</a> and some <a href="http://www.insanelygreattees.com/">insanely great tees</a>, has released a new application called <a href="http://www.magnetismstudios.com/MonkeyBusinessLabs/FilemarkMaker">Filemark Maker</a> for Mac OS X that allows an iPhone or iPod Touch user to convert any Safari-compatible media file into a bookmarklet, making it possible to store files on your iPhone/iPod Touch without the need for internet access. That means you have access to your files everywhere, even if your iPhone is in airplane mode or without a connection.</p>
<p>Filemark maker can convert any PDF, text, MS Word, Excel, or high-definition picture file into a bookmarklet. (There is a 6mb filesize limitation). Just drag-and-drop any file onto the Filemark Maker application droplet and Filemark Maker lets you bookmark that file from within Safari. So the next time you sync your iPhone&#8217;s bookmarks, all of your files you saved into Safari are now accessible on your iPhone or iPod Touch.</p>
<p>In case you are wondering, these special bookmarklets work by converting the data stored in the file into a javascript statement. Filemark Maker composes the javascript and allows you to save it in the form of a Safari bookmark, which can be synced to your iPhone or iPod Touch. Since all of the data needed is stored in the bookmark, the iPhone is able to render the file on-the-fly without the need to load any information from a server. What&#8217;s great about bookmarklets is they don&#8217;t require a user to hack or jailbreak their iPhone or iPod touch. It&#8217;s an efficient and secure way to store and view your static documents on-the-go.</p>
<p>There are some other bookmarklets out there that utilize javascript that enable an iPhone or iPod Touch user to do other cool stuff with MobileSafari. There&#8217;s a handful of them available at <a href="http://www.lifeclever.com/17-powerful-bookmarklets-for-your-iphone/">LifeClever</a>, including a &#8220;find on this page&#8221; function. <a href="http://pixelspread.com/blog/322/iphone-webclip-bookmarklet">PixelSpread</a> has created another awesome bookmarklet that allows you to override a site&#8217;s iPhone webclip icon and replace it with one of your choice.</p>
<p>Filemark Maker is freeware and is available for download from the Monkey Business Labs <a href="http://www.magnetismstudios.com/MonkeyBusinessLabs/FilemarkMaker">website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appleology.com/2008/01/27/store-files-on-your-iphone-or-itouch-without-jailbreak-with-filemark-maker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Apple, please finish Leopard&#8217;s UI</title>
		<link>http://www.appleology.com/2007/09/25/dear-apple-please-finish-leopards-ui/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appleology.com/2007/09/25/dear-apple-please-finish-leopards-ui/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Appleologist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appleology.com/2007/09/25/dear-apple-please-finish-leopards-ui/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple&#8217;s been busy lately refining the user interface OS X for the upcoming Leopard release. However, there are several remaining user interface elements that have yet to be updated to the new Aqua-dark UI. And with rumors that Leopard has reached release candidate status with the latest seed, I&#8217;m worried that those Aqua-blue elements will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple&#8217;s been busy lately refining the user interface OS X for the upcoming Leopard release. However, there are several remaining user interface elements that have yet to be updated to the new Aqua-dark UI. And with rumors that Leopard has reached <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2007/09/25/leopard-in-release-cantidate-cycle-9a559-gallery/">release candidate</a> status with the latest seed, I&#8217;m worried that those Aqua-blue elements will never be updated, and they will remain in the OS for another two years.</p>
<p>First of all, Apple has yet to replace the standard blue bubbly interface objects with the iTunes dark pill interface objects. The new Leopard user interface is pretty much a direct derivative of the UI work Apple has done to iTunes, however Apple has continued to ignore the new iTunes interface objects in the interface transition. While some may be opposed to the iTunes dark objects, the Aqua-blue objects seem so out of place with the new unified UI. I would also be happy if they just updated the scrollbar, if Apple doesn&#8217;t think the other iTunes objects work well on a cross-OS level. Hopefully they do something about it before Gold Master.</p>
<p><img src="http://appleology.com/images/leopardicons.png" style="float: right;" alt="Leopard Folder Icons" />Many are also uncomfortable with the new folder icons. Some claim they seem too &#8220;IBM&#8217;, others too &#8220;Windows&#8221;, to other they seem too &#8220;Linux&#8221;. While I have to agree, Tiger&#8217;s folder icon set definitely needing a refresh. I think the problem with the new folders lies with its two-dimensional perspective and its overall blandness. If the folders were offset and/or made more realistically, it would definitely improve the appearance of the icons. <a href="http://www.indiehig.com/blog/2007/09/09/fix-the-leopard-folders/">IndieHIG</a> has come up with a pretty detailed criticism and analysis of the new icons, which highlight many of the complaints I and many others have with the new folder icons.</p>
<p><img src="http://appleology.com/images/frontrow-2.png" style="float: right;" alt="Front Row 2.0" />Apple has improved Front Row to resemble and function very much like an AppleTV. So far, the only UI complaint with Front Row 2.0 is the launch and quit transitions. With Front Row 1.0, there&#8217;s a nice slick transition between the desktop and Front Row. Apparently with Front Row 2.0, Apple has had to trash that nice transition for a simple fade. Hopefully Apple can come up with a better transition than a fade when it comes time to the release.</p>
<p>Mail.app&#8217;s and Preview&#8217;s icons remain ugly. Why has Apple not yet unified the entire UI like they promised. Preview and Mail&#8217;s toolbars are totally off from the rest of the interface. It&#8217;d be alright if they were somewhat decent, but these toolbar icons are simply hideous, especially with the darker unified window backgrounds. </p>
<p>While these suggestions may seem like rather insignificant, I can say that I am not alone that Apple needs to really work on making Leopard the best they possibly can &#8211; and to not rush things. Because usually, the first version of an OS X is nearly identical with the final version feature-wise. So please Apple, finish the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appleology.com/2007/09/25/dear-apple-please-finish-leopards-ui/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leopard 9A559 User Interface Improvements</title>
		<link>http://www.appleology.com/2007/09/22/leopard-9a559-user-interface-improvements/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appleology.com/2007/09/22/leopard-9a559-user-interface-improvements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 01:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Appleologist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appleology.com/2007/09/22/leopard-9a559-user-interface-improvements/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple today seeded version 9A559 of Leopard, which according to MacRumors, fixes &#8220;two known issues for Leopard. The two issues described involve upgrading from Tiger to Leopard on PowerPC systems in certain scenarios, and HP printer drivers.&#8221;
With this seed, Apple continued to polish Leopard&#8217;s user interface. New app icons, new desktop backgrounds, new welcome video, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://appleology.com/images/9a559-desktop.png" style="float: right;" alt="9A559 Desktop Icon" />Apple today seeded version 9A559 of Leopard, which according to MacRumors, fixes &#8220;two known issues for Leopard. The two issues described involve upgrading from Tiger to Leopard on PowerPC systems in certain scenarios, and HP printer drivers.&#8221;</p>
<p>With this seed, Apple continued to polish Leopard&#8217;s user interface. New app icons, new desktop backgrounds, new welcome video, and UI elements polish.</p>
<p>An important change Apple&#8217;s made with OS X is now some of the more important CoreService applications, like Spotlight, Exposé, and Front Row can be launched through independent apps that are now available in the Applications folder, similar to the Dashboard app. Spaces can also be launched as an application.</p>
<p><img src="http://appleology.com/images/9a559-dock.png" alt="9A559 Dock" /></p>
<p>Other minor tweaks Apple has made with 9A559 include:</p>
<ul>
<li>iCal displaying the date even when not active</li>
<li>New music with the welcome video</li>
<li>New icons for the Desktop, <a href="http://appleology.com/images/9a559-spaces.png">Spaces</a>, and <a href="http://appleology.com/images/9a559-frontrow.png">Front Row</a></li>
<li>New desktop backgrounds. <a href="http://appleology.com/images/earth.jpg">One</a> of them is the iPhone&#8217;s default desktop background (which was taken by NASA), the <a href="http://appleology.com/images/earth2.jpg">other</a> is a beautiful profile of the Earth.</li>
<li>Further universal UI polishing</li>
</ul>
<p>It looks like Leopard is really close to reaching Release Candidate stage. As Apple continues to push out seeds more frequently, it seems Apple&#8217;s making the final UI polishes before Leopard is finally declared Gold Master. So far, I&#8217;m really impressed with the improvements Apple&#8217;s made with the UI.</p>
<h4>New Welcome Video</h4>
<p><object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y4TeKG98kiQ"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y4TeKG98kiQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appleology.com/2007/09/22/leopard-9a559-user-interface-improvements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leopard&#8217;s new space-themed welcome video and desktop wallpaper</title>
		<link>http://www.appleology.com/2007/08/25/leopards-new-space-themed-welcome-video-and-desktop-wallpaper/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appleology.com/2007/08/25/leopards-new-space-themed-welcome-video-and-desktop-wallpaper/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 01:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Appleologist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leopard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appleology.com/2007/08/25/leopards-new-sci-fi-welcome-video-and-wallpaper/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple has recently seeded an update to its beta-testing developers, with codenames 9A527 and 9A528A. Developers are claiming the OS is close to receiving final candidate status. The update features greatly improved performance and stability, as well as a surprising number of UI tweaks.
Developers are also noticing some of the UI tweaks Apple has made [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://appleology.com/images/space-desktop.png"><img src="http://appleology.com/images/space-desktop-download.png" alt="Leopard Space Wallpaper" style="float: right;" /></a>Apple has recently seeded an update to its beta-testing developers, with codenames 9A527 and 9A528A. Developers are claiming the OS is close to receiving final candidate status. The update features greatly improved performance and stability, as well as a surprising number of UI tweaks.</p>
<p>Developers are also noticing some of the UI tweaks Apple has made to Leopard since the previous version. In seed <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2007/08/24/apple-seeds-mac-os-x-leopard-9a527-9a528a/">9A528a</a>, Mac OS X now sports a space theme in Leopard. A few developers have already leaked some of the new UI elements, including Leopard&#8217;s new welcome video and the new default desktop wallpaper that complements Time Machine&#8217;s sci-fi theme. The new translucent menu bar is now less transparent by default and the dock is also receiving a few minor tweaks. It also seems the window action buttons (close, minimize, and expand) are now vector-based.</p>
<div align="center"><object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/q6yW-mo-_t4"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/q6yW-mo-_t4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appleology.com/2007/08/25/leopards-new-space-themed-welcome-video-and-desktop-wallpaper/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Apple&#8217;s current Mac Mini strategy is failing</title>
		<link>http://www.appleology.com/2007/08/08/why-apples-current-mac-mini-strategy-is-failing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appleology.com/2007/08/08/why-apples-current-mac-mini-strategy-is-failing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 21:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Appleologist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rumors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appleology.com/2007/08/08/why-apples-current-mac-mini-strategy-is-failing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mac Mini seemed like it had a bright future ahead of itself when Steve Jobs first introduced it at MacWorld 2005. It was introduced as the perfect switcher&#8217;s machine, since it was &#8220;bare bones&#8221;, cheap, and allowed for connection to third party displays, keyboards, and mice. When Steve introduced the new machine, it was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://appleology.com/images/macmini.png" style="float: right;" alt="Mac Mini" />The Mac Mini seemed like it had a bright future ahead of itself when Steve Jobs first introduced it at MacWorld 2005. It was introduced as the perfect switcher&#8217;s machine, since it was &#8220;bare bones&#8221;, cheap, and allowed for connection to third party displays, keyboards, and mice. When Steve introduced the new machine, it was available for only $499 and it received a lot of positive press. But the popularity of the low-budget machine  has been declining ever since it&#8217;s launch. Some analysts and bloggers even predicted Apple was to drop the Mac Mini models from its product line yesterday at the August 7 special event. Steve didn&#8217;t make a mention of it in his Keynote, but it survived and even quiet speed-bump to all of its models. But in my opinion, I don&#8217;t see how much longer the Mac Mini can continue to survive with Apple&#8217;s current strategy.</p>
<h4>BYOKMD doesn&#8217;t work for low-budget consumers</h4>
<p>The Mac Mini hasn&#8217;t been a great success in large part because of Apple&#8217;s flawed Mac Mini strategy. Yesterday, Steve discussed Apple&#8217;s philosophy on consumer products, he said,&#8221;It&#8217;s an All-in-One World&#8221;. But the Mac Mini is the farthest thing from an all-in-one machine. Most low-budgeted consumers don&#8217;t already have a display and/or peripherals. So, when checking out the Mac Mini, they don&#8217;t understand the Mac Mini&#8217;s lack of a display, mouse, or keyboard; and they ultimately look to alternatives because of this. The Mac Mini doesn&#8217;t offer everything out of the box, and that turns off many low-budget consumers.</p>
<p>Additionally, customers realize that the price of a Mac Mini with a display, mouse, and keyboard would be around the same price as a MacBook or an iMac.</p>
<h4>AppleTV is replacing the Mac Mini as the affordable media center solution</h4>
<p>Initially, many Mac Mini users were using their Mac Mini as a home media center. And now, Apple&#8217;s cutting into it&#8217;s own marketshare, since the AppleTV has replaced the Mac Mini as the preferred Apple media center for half the price. This effect will only snowball as the AppleTV gains more functionality and popularity.</p>
<h4>$599 > $499</h4>
<p>When the Mac Mini was unveiled, Apple was getting a lot of positive feedback for finally offering a budget-driven Macintosh for only $499. But Apple quietly increased that price $100 for each model on the February 28th special event in 2006 and has yet to lower the models back to their original prices, while other PC manufacturers have continued to lower their prices. That extra $100 makes a big difference for a lot of people, especially when the consumer has to buy a separate mouse, keyboard, and display in order to use the computer.</p>
<h4>A proven failure</h4>
<p>Right now, the Mac Mini seems to be going through the &#8220;Cube effect&#8221;. Two Apple-related products, the NeXT Cube and the PowerMac G4 Cube, were both discontinued due to their high price-points and lack of necessary peripherals. Those two products also didn&#8217;t survive because consumers prefer functionality over design. And unfortunately, it looks as if the Mac Mini is already on the way to suffering the same fate if Apple doesn&#8217;t do anything about it.</p>
<h4>How Apple can save the Mac Mini</h4>
<p>The Mac Mini&#8217;s price-point aren&#8217;t targeted toward a big consumer audience. It&#8217;s awkwardly priced too high for low-end consumers, and it doesn&#8217;t offer some of the features <a href="http://blogs.smugmug.com/don/2007/08/08/wheres-the-mac/">high-end consumers want that can&#8217;t afford a Mac Pro and already have a display</a>. Apple could either go two directions with the Mac Mini, lower its value and cater to the really low-end consumer; or bump up its graphics and processing capabilities and cater to a higher-level consumer audience that already have a display. Either way, the Mac Mini would finally be saved from its unfortunate fate and finally have a respectable place in Apple&#8217;s product line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appleology.com/2007/08/08/why-apples-current-mac-mini-strategy-is-failing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iMovie &#8216;08 makes custom slideshow production easy</title>
		<link>http://www.appleology.com/2007/08/08/imovie-08-makes-custom-slideshow-production-easy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appleology.com/2007/08/08/imovie-08-makes-custom-slideshow-production-easy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 20:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Appleologist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iLife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appleology.com/2007/08/08/imovie-08-makes-custom-slideshow-production-easy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iMovie has always made it impossible to produce advanced slideshows, especially when setting custom Ken Burns start-and-end frames. The problem used to lie with iMovie&#8217;s sluggish importing and encoding functions, however the problem seems to have been fixed with iMovie &#8216;08, thanks to Apple&#8217;s decision to completely rewrite the application. Encoding and clip manipulation performance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://appleology.com/images/imovie.png" style="float: right;" alt="iPhoto '08" />iMovie has always made it impossible to produce advanced slideshows, especially when setting custom Ken Burns start-and-end frames. The problem used to lie with iMovie&#8217;s sluggish importing and encoding functions, however the problem seems to have been fixed with iMovie &#8216;08, thanks to Apple&#8217;s decision to completely rewrite the application. Encoding and clip manipulation performance is faster than ever, and the new user interface is clean and intuitive.</p>
<p>Previously with iLife &#8216;08, making a fully-customized Ken Burns DVD slideshow was impossible. The <a href="http://appleology.com/2006/09/01/how-to-make-the-perfect-dvd-slideshow-in-ilife/">closest</a> you could get to a fully-customized slideshow involved making an iPhoto slideshow with custom Ken Burns effects and audio, exporting it to a QuickTime file, and importing it into an iDVD project. However, it was impossible to add and mix multiple audio tracks into the slideshow and iPhoto&#8217;s user interface made customizing each photo&#8217;s effects awkward. The entire slideshow production workflow just wasn&#8217;t thought out very well by Apple.</p>
<p>Thanks to the iMovie code rewrite, photo slideshows are now fully customizable and easy to produce inside iMovie. iMovie is no longer sluggish when importing and encoding photos, start-and-end Ken Burn frames are now easy to manage, and managing multiple audio tracks and transitions are more intuitive than before. iMovie &#8216;08 also has much-improved transition management.</p>
<p><img src="http://appleology.com/images/imovie-kenburns.png" class="light" alt="iMovie and Ken Burns" /></p>
<p>But on the other hand, Apple&#8217;s new iMovie rewrite has left a few features out that many will miss, such as movie themes and video effects. Fortunately, the iLife &#8216;08 installer does not remove the previous version of iMovie, instead moving it inside a directory within the Applications folder named &#8220;iMovie (previous version)&#8221;. Hopefully Apple is already working on implementing the various features they left behind with iMovie &#8216;06 into the new iMovie in a future software update, because once iMovie has those great features back it will once again become the easiest-to-use, most stable, and most fully-featured movie production application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appleology.com/2007/08/08/imovie-08-makes-custom-slideshow-production-easy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Core 2 Duo Mac Minis, aluminum keyboards</title>
		<link>http://www.appleology.com/2007/08/07/new-core-2-duo-mac-minis-aluminum-keyboards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.appleology.com/2007/08/07/new-core-2-duo-mac-minis-aluminum-keyboards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Appleologist</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Updates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.appleology.com/2007/08/07/new-core-2-duo-mac-minis-aluminum-keyboards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the Mac Mini survived and finally gets a speed bump and new upgrade options, including dual-layer superdrive options and additional hard drive and RAM options.
The 1.83 GHz combo drive model is available for $599 and the 2.0GHz superdrive model is available for $799. Each models have standard 1GB RAM, and the 1.8 GHz model [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://appleology.com/images/wirelesskb-side.png" style="float: right;" alt="Apple Wireless Keyboard" />Today the Mac Mini survived and finally gets a speed bump and new upgrade options, including dual-layer superdrive options and additional hard drive and RAM options.</p>
<p>The 1.83 GHz combo drive model is available for $599 and the 2.0GHz superdrive model is available for $799. Each models have standard 1GB RAM, and the 1.8 GHz model has a 80GB HD while the 2.0 GHz model has a 120GB HD.</p>
<p>The new aluminum keyboards are also available for $79 for the wireless model and $49 for the wired model. Apple has discontinued the full wireless keyboard, replacing it with a wireless MacBook-sized keyboard. The decision has already brought on a lot of harsh criticism from bloggers and reviewers who miss the full-sized wireless keyboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.appleology.com/2007/08/07/new-core-2-duo-mac-minis-aluminum-keyboards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
